Schreiner’s Media Landscape

August 16, 2010

Digital Diddling vs. Natural Noodling; Studying How Nature and Technology Change Our Brains

“Music has charms to soothe the savage breast” is what playwright William Congreve wrote in 1697. But what do cell phones, computers, video games, and other techno-distractors do to us and can Nature reverse the ill effects of technomania or the “heartache and thousand natural shocks that flesh is heir to” that Shakespeare’s Hamlet whined about?

For this answer, we turn from post-Enlightenment dramatists to 20th century folk comics. “Five neuroscientists are in a raft going down the San Juan River” the joke starts. But it’s not a joke- at least there’s no punch line yet. These brainiacs have come to Utah to literally float away from modern life for a while and hopefully find out how neurotic our Blackberrys, Xboxes, and iPods make us. Simultaneously, they hope to find out if getting away from these things and, more specifically, into un-technofied natural areas or wilderness heal the wounds.

Similar studies have been done on the negative effects of modernism and the positive effects of Nature on children like Richard Louv’s famous “Last Child in the Woods.” I can say from personal experience that getting away from my computers, phone, TV and other gadgetry not only calms me down but engages me in life on Earth on a level that’s impossible from in front of a glowing screen or the wheel of a dangerous, moving vehicle.

I wish the professors luck. More than that, I hope they have a great time here in Utah. I know I do.

August 15, 2010

Solar Power Growth in Utah Finally Paying Off? Major Developments Prove The Sun is Too Big to Fail

It’s been four years since we went solar. It started with Solarius Precarious (pic left), our 2 kWh, sun-tracking array in November 2006 (it went on-line in March 2007). We expanded our commitment in January 2010 with the installation of our solar hot water system (video below). During this time, we’ve felt strangely alone. Not only do the vast majority of people not share our beliefs, commitment, and investment. Many of them still consider us stupid, crazy, and perhaps even dangerous.

After a couple of years endlessly talking about and promoting solar energy- part of my role as director for the Utah Solar Energy Association which I left in 2009 after three years- I’ve pretty much stopped. In conversation or at parties, I still get the blank disinterested looks, the angry eco-terrorist-in-our-midst reactions, and more than anything, the I-just-don’t-get-it capitulation. It’s at that point I cease my ramblings and return to the subjects of other people’s kids, movies, celebrity scandals, and the other stuff most people seem to care about.

Throw in the lousy economy and a president who seems to have abandoned his commitment to clean energy and solar appears to be a dead issue. But a couple of developments the past few days have me encouraged again. First,

the Salt Lake Tribune ran this article today about the growth of Utah’s solar industry. There are woefully few articles about the subject here despite the fact that we are one of the best places in the world to have solar. FYI: I

was featured in one of the few in the Deseret News last year (pic from the article at right). Things have definitely improved in Utah from when I got here in 2006. But the change has been glacial, mostly because of the ruling

Republican Party’s blind allegiance to coal, the fossil fuel lobby, the bad economy, and lack of effective renewable energy industry lobbyists.

Second, my commitment, promotion, and knowledge of solar power may have scored my biggest renewable energy video gig. I can’t give out details yet. I’ll know more this week and report it here. All I can tell you is it’s big- really big. That’s why I’m so excited about solar again. Not just for me but for the entire planet. Things are indeed changing for the better. And it makes me want to talk about it again- even if I still get the blank looks and have to talk about other people’s kids first.

August 10, 2010

EPA Crackdown on Cement, Mercury Pollution; Finally a Solution?

Inexplicably, people have been scratching their heads for decades over where all the mercury pollution in our lakes, rivers, and other waterways is coming from. It’s been steadily increasing in our fish supply during this time and prompted occasional then permanent warnings about the dangers of eating fish because of the escalating amounts of mercury in them, regardless of species. Utah’s Great Salt Lake is a cesspool of mercury. It sits among a cement plant, a couple of smelters, and a coal-burning power plant, all known mercury polluters. Yet, researchers seem at a loss to determine the source of the pollution. All I do is read a little and I figured it out.

We’ve known the source of most of this mercury all this time and have done nothing- until now. The Environmental Protection Agency is finally going after cement manufacturers, the leading emitter of mercury and one of the biggest contributors to greenhouse gas emissions and possible human-induced climate change. This will not sit well with birthers, right-wingers, Andrew Breitbart groupies, and other Earth-happiness-and-peace haters who think restricting their right to destroy the planet is another sign of the apocalypse.

How about cancer, asthma, birth defects, and heart attacks? Better now? Of course.

August 2, 2010

Where’s the Wave of Support for Rewewables After BP’s Gulf Disaster?

Filed under: America, Children, Earth, Environment, Nature, Oil, Solar, Utah, coal, conservation, mining, pollution, renewable — Ken Schreiner @ 1:08 pm

As I rode my bike along Willow Creek near downtown Park City the other day, I noticed something new since I’d been there a year ago. There were about seven new homes, built not only to be affordable but also passively and actively solar. They all had at least 1kWh of solar PVs and enough solar thermal panels to provide hot water for a family of at least four. As a construction guy told me at a bar later on, it’s the first subdivision of its type in Park City. This from one of the most otherwise progressive towns in America. I mean, they have a dog park.

But instead of being happy, I was actually rather sad. Seeing these new homes, which fit my idea of what all new home and office and construction should be, I thought about the BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. I tried to detect a change in my own attitude as well as the rest of America. It didn’t change me much because, frankly, I changed my mind about renewable energy about ten years ago. Sadly, it has had almost zero impact on the rest of America.

No one seems to understand that our dependence on fossil fuels- oil as well as coal- is finite. No one seems to care that the toll on our children is going to far outweigh the convenience we enjoy now because of our fossil fuel folly. No one seems to care about anything except not wanting to hear about it any more. Just as they don’t want to think about energy, power, pollution or any of that ever, they don’t want to hear any more about BP, oil spills, solar power, or the people of Earth having to change their habits or face a bleak and avoidable future.

We just don’t care. Do we?

July 19, 2010

China Now World’s Biggest Energy Hog; Is America Losing- or Learning?

The U.S. is still by far the biggest energy consumer per capita, with the average American burning five times as much energy annually as the average Chinese citizen…”

- Fatih Birol, chief economist, International Energy Agency

There was a time a hundred years ago when being the biggest consumer of energy was considered good. No, not just good. The best. That’s when the United States surpassed England as the preeminent world economic power. Now China has done it to the USA. It was only a matter of time.

Energy for manufacturing and commerce has previously been more important than energy for simply living. China is now the leading manufacturing nation so it stands to reason it would use more energy. But with humans having more spare time on their hands, and manufacturing becoming more efficient, it follows that China- the most populous nation on the planet- would surpass everybody in energy use because they simply have more people. Computers, TVs, video games, iPhones, cars, lawn mowers, air conditioners and furnaces. All these things require using utility-provided energy. And in case you hadn’t noticed, gas is not 29 cents a gallon anymore.

However, statistics from the International Energy Agency show Americans use FIVE TIMES as much energy as the average Chinese citizen. With China’s hard times still visible in the rearview mirror, their people have not become as lazy, stupid, and wasteful as Americans are. Hey, it took us 100 years to get that way. Given China’s rapid growth, you’d think they’d catch up to us pretty soon. But as consumer products become more and more energy efficient, the chances of that happening look pretty dim- kind of like the lights of New York City on a hot, summer day.

Does this spell doom for the USA as the world’s leading country, as it did with Great Britain at the turn of the 20th century? Happily, no. Conservation has always been an evasive characteristic of a powerful nation. Wealth leads to waste. Luxury largesse. Now, because of dwindling resources and a poor economy, Americans are being forced to conserve as we did  during World War 2. The Chinese will soon find out after exhausting their seemingly inexhaustible supplies of fossil fuels, they must make hard choices. Hopefully, they will learn from America’s bad example and choose conservation now to avert the energy crisis the USA is now in the grips of.

America’s energy crisis has resulted in more conservation. But it has not spurred competitive development of renewable energy resources as it has in China, Germany, Japan, Spain and virtually every other country. The good news is America is finally stopping the insane, profligate use of fossil fuels to power and pollute our country and planet. But the new champions of insane, profligate energy use- China, India, Brazil- have already put in place industry and residential incentives for renewable energy development and use anticipating the problem that has crippled America due to its continuing dependence on oil and coal, failure to plan for the ultimate exhaustion of those supplies, and the damage they ironically cause its economy and inhabitants.

That puts China and the rest even farther ahead of the USA. And that- as they say in Beijing- is the bad news.

June 23, 2010

Algeria Fails to Destroy USA “Great Satan” Soccer Team; Executions Scheduled Tuesday

Filed under: America, Earth, God, dualism, religion, sports, television, video — Ken Schreiner @ 5:07 pm

It was about as exciting a soccer game as I’ve ever seen. As a former player myself, I’m excited for the US side but more than concerned about the defeated Algerian squad (the soccer team and the “death” variety that will be shooting them). Being a radically fundamentalist Islamic nation, Algeria will not take their defeat at the hands of the most evil country on Earth lightly. Expect the coach to beheaded publicly (not live on ESPN but handled later with highlights on Sportscenter), the starting players to be kidnapped, shot, or shot then kidnapped. Or for the bench warmers, simple imprisonment and torture.

It could be worse. They could have their endorsement contracts nullified.

May 12, 2010

BP Oil Rig Similar to 9/11: The Question Is Why It Wasn’t Prevented

Filed under: 9/11, America, Bush, Cheney, Congress, Earth, Environment, Iraq, Oil, dualism, politics, pollution, water — Ken Schreiner @ 4:50 pm

“How can a device that has 260 failure modes be considered fail-safe?”

- Rep. Bart Stupak on the catastrophic failure of spill prevention equipment

The oil industry, Republican Party and other radical right-wingers openly express their hatred for environmentalists, calling us “wackos”, “treehuggers”, and most inaccurate and reckless, “terrorists.” Terrorists are normally considered bad people so why someone who wants to save the planet and its inhabitants, including members of the Tea Party,  is bad I don’t quite understand.

It turns out Rush and the radical right were wrong- SURPRISE!- about the BP oil rig being sabotaged by eco-terrorists. It was massive equipment and policy failure by the companies involved- the “drill, baby, drill” team. But with ten per cent of America still believing environmentalists are responsible and environmentalism still being “bad”, this delusion needs to be analyzed for its self-destructive origins and utter uselessness as a “policy”, and the outrage directed more accurately and constructively.

First of all, environmentalists are not going to hurt the planet or people to PREVENT hurting the planet or people. No one can compete with right-wingers for violence against the planet and killing people. Which brings us back to 9/11 and BP. The 9/11 terrorists were bad people.  But al-Qaeda’s and Saudi Arabia’s attack on America is less perplexing and outrageous than why we didn’t stop it when we had a previous attack, advance intelligence, and information indicating not only what was going to happen but when, how, by whom.

Now like 9/11, the question in the BP oil disaster in the Gulf of Mexico is not so much what went wrong and how but why the systems we had in place to prevent it failed so cataclysmically. Sadly, the answers are different but quite simple: in 9/11, the Bush Administration was stupid or complicit. But it’s obvious they cared because they spent the next eight years struggling to make up for their mistakes on 9/11. However, with the BP oil disaster, the oil industry showed again they just don’t care. Their leaders’ peformance at the current congressional hearings indicates no interest in changing that position.

If they did care, the blowout preventer’s battery wouldn’t have been dead. Nor would there have been leaks, outages and a shutdown of a crucial “fail-safe” system as was revealed at today’s hearing. Ironically, BP had just spent millions repairing the rig to pump more oil, but just couldn’t find a few thousand bucks to maintain their blowout preventer. So who are the real “environmental wackos” here?

America’s security industry claims to have learned much from 9/11. Certainly, the advances in security changed life in America. And if no 9/11s since then was the objective, we have succeeded. Maybe the oil industry will learn something too and spend the right amount to make sure this never happens again. But all that knowledge and money spent protecting the planet will be wasted if they don’t first learn to care about it.

May 10, 2010

Gulf Oil Slick Containment “Efforts” Fail Because BP Didn’t Have a Plan

Filed under: Earth, Environment, Oil, pollution, water — Ken Schreiner @ 8:27 am

“What we’ve been doing is pushing parallel paths because we don’t know which one’s going to work.”

- BP Chief Operating Officer Doug Suttles

“If you don’t have a backup plan, you don’t have a plan.”

- Ken Schreiner (me)

WHAT DOES THIS BP OFFICIAL MEAN THEY “DON’T KNOW” what will stop the oil spill?” Name me a successful company that doesn’t know how to fix its product when it breaks. Think of companies that ruin themselves and other people’s lives because they don’t know or, worse, DON’T CARE ENOUGH TO PLAN how to fix their products. Toyota?

If these are the smartest people in the room controlling the world’s systems- remember Enron?- if these are the corporations dictating transportation, energy and other crucial policies, then we are in much deeper trouble than we think. If this incompetence and recklessness doesn’t stop off-shore oil drilling for good, then we deserve the ugly planet, environmental diseases, and ceaseless and worsening catastrophes we have wrought.

May 7, 2010

BP Gulf Oil Spill: Compare Renewable vs. Fossil Fuels First, Then Debate

Yet another major disaster involving fossil fuels has people talking about renewable energy again. But only until the corporate news media get tired of the story and start chasing Sarah Palin and Tiger Woods again. So if you want to REALLY understand the difference between a nation and world that run on poisonous crap and one that runs on non-polluting, natural energy, here’s a simple chart put together by RenewableEnergyWorld.com.

Argue over taxes, geopolitics, supply and demand, and economies of scale all you want. The reality is we can’t survive in a fossil fuel world anymore. We can switch to renewables now or when it’s too late- if it isn’t already.

May 4, 2010

Young People Prefer Virtual Travel to Real Travel: What’s Wrong With That?

Filed under: 9/11, America, Earth, Environment, Internet, conservation, media, pollution, video — Ken Schreiner @ 10:45 am

“Perhaps worryingly, a new generation will reject travel altogether in favour of gaming, social networking and ‘always on’ media.”

- Futurologist Dr. Ian Yeoman, author of “Tomorrow’s Tourist”

Many people assume that doing something “real” is better than doing something “virtual” (the implication being “artificial” and “artificial” being “bad”).  This attitude somehow doesn’t apply to diet sodas, sports, or Hollywood. This has become more of a social issue with the advent of computer games, virtual reality simulators and other devices and programs that provide an incredibly satisfying if not total replacement for “being there.” This article from the UK’s Telegraph implies that young people not wanting to really travel somewhere but wanting to still have the experience of going there is wrong. I disagree.

Our age of terrorism, high fuel prices, airlines and car companies’ economic troubles, coincides with an age of digital advances that make computers and applications cheap and the virtual experiences they provide even more rewarding for all these reasons. A new study into this phenomenon shows the trend particularly evident in Japan and Europe but we all know it’s going on everywhere.

So what if young Jason or Emily don’t want to hitchhike across Europe after college like their parents did? They’d rather have a car or iPad anyway. Many of the world’s natural and human-made landmarks are suffering damage and security problems due to over-tourism. The environmental ravages of too many jets, cars, roads and other infrastructural pressures resulting from the race to exploit tourism’s popularity- China’s new road to Mount Everest chief among them- are forcing the periodic or permanent closure of some of the world’s treasures.

It’s better for people stay home and play computer games- maybe even COMMUNICATE WITH EACH OTHER- than further pollute the planet, drive up fuel prices, and invite terrorist attacks. Better yet, when we get the urge to jump on a plane to Paris, we should all just walk around the block instead. Everyone would win- except, of course, the multi-billion-dollar global tourism industry. But if they’ve got billions already, they probably won’t miss your or my or the coming generation’s measly millions.

Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress