Voice of Reason in the ORV, ATV Subset
Thursday, July 10th, 2008Every once in a while, someone, in this case, someone I won’t name but if you click the link below you can read the whole thread, crystallizes an issue so well there’s almost no way you can argue with it unless you’re not listening, don’t care or are just recklessly suicidal. So I’m stealing this comment from New West about the ORV/ATV controversy:
This issue is as polarizing as the debate around abortion or global warming. We have the ORV users on one side and the wilderness advocates on the other - each are rabidly passionate about their cause. The 95% of the population that lies in between, in my opinion, doesn’t care. The wilderness people will say that the majority of the country agrees with them. I find that unlikely. Of the millions that will visit Yellowstone this year how many are there to commune with nature or worship mother earth’s sacred ground? No they want full hook-ups, asphalt paths, latte’s, wi-fi, and an exciting river rafting ride. And these are normal everyday people.
Equating the creation of a rut on a forest trail to the beating of one’s wife or children is way way over-the-top and not an argument that the general public is going to buy into. You will certainly never convince me of that. Perhaps it is just my rural midwestern upbringing. I believe in conservation (my wife and I just bought a hybrid car). I believe in protecting natural places. I’m all for protecting riparian zones and wetlands as much as any environmentalist. Just ask the ducks in my back yard. I guess where I differ though is that I just don’t believe that every mud hole equates to some sort of horrible environmental catastrophe. I just don’t buy that.
I guess I’m in the distinct minority of people out there that loves to do it all. I love to hike, I love to fish, I love to camp, I love to canoe and kayak. I also love to waterski behind my personal watercraft. I love to ride my ATV. I love to ride my dual sport trail motorcycle. I’m lucky enough to live in a state where I can do all of the above on public lands and waters.
A place for everything when everything is in its place. In my state we have wilderness areas, wildlife management areas, state forests, and state parks where motorized recreation is not allowed and I hope is forever not allowed.
We absolutely need places like that (but for the wilderness advocates it is, of course, never enough). I also hope we can forever provide places for people to enjoy a motorized experience - backcountry and primitive areas where a person can enjoy a Jeep drive or ATV ride. I love exploring roads and trails on my ATV or dirtbike. Sometimes I just want to cover as many miles as possible and see where a road or trail leads to. It is a completely different experience than hiking. I like both.
I do agree that the ORV community has its problems. We have lots of ORV users with an entitlement mentality who believe they can do whatever they want, whenever they want, and however they want. It is not just a “few bad-apples” issue. For those who want to “rip it up” with high-horsepower, loud exhausts, and deep knobbies we have places for that kind of activity - called race tracks. They’re all over the place. I know because I go there myself. So I do have a plea to certain ORV users, and that is, “Please, please don’t take your race-exhaust equipped motocross bike or your monster-mudder nitrous equipped ATV to public riding areas. That’s not the place for them.”
The solution is not to unilaterally ban all ORV users from public land. It is very hard to legislate attitudes. I’m committed to help solve the issues and believe we can solve them, so that my kids can take their kids and explore these same ATV trails.

